Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 11:53:15 -0700 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>, Alan Cox <alc@rice.edu>, Alan Cox <alc@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, performance@freebsd.org, "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PostgreSQL performance on FreeBSD Message-ID: <1603235.2ShtoCfSqO@ralph.baldwin.cx> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmomt=WYjct%2BzsTbHuryxqYp7ELyS52LOb4NEsfENQ1yj1w@mail.gmail.com> References: <20140627125613.GT93733@kib.kiev.ua> <CAJ-Vmom-M=R=FaBfHE5c2%2BYxW0SLmJTdFJD8tW4_aOD7MDNwzA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmomt=WYjct%2BzsTbHuryxqYp7ELyS52LOb4NEsfENQ1yj1w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, June 03, 2016 11:29:03 AM Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 3 June 2016 at 11:27, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > That and the other NUMA stuff is something to address in -12. > > And, I completely welcome continued development in NUMA scaling in > combination with discussion. The iterator changes I committed are a > more generic version of a patch people were applying on top of -10 and > -head for at least what, three years now? Maybe more if -9 also just > did round-robin and not first-touch? 8 and 9 did first-touch. Only 10 did round-robin. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1603235.2ShtoCfSqO>