From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 26 9: 2:51 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61DEB37B401; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:02:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [66.127.85.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BCC643F93; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:02:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from melange (melange.errno.com [66.127.85.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.12.5/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h1QH2enN090864 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:02:42 -0800 (PST)?g (envelope-from sam@errno.com)œ X-Authentication-Warning: ebb.errno.com: Host melange.errno.com [66.127.85.82] claimed to be melange Message-ID: <284e01c2ddb8$e00685c0$52557f42@errno.com> From: "Sam Leffler" To: "Jan Grant" , "Jacques A. Vidrine" Cc: "Mike Tancsa" , "freebsd-stable" References: Subject: Re: HEADS UP: OpenSSL 0.9.7 in -STABLE Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:02:40 -0800 Organization: Errno Consulting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 10:30:54AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > At 07:32 AM 25/02/2003 -0600, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > > > > > >I believe you also need `device cryptodev', else when your application > > > >tries to open /dev/crypto it will get ENXIO (use truss or ktrace to > > > >see if this is what is happening). > > > > > > That was it, Thanks! > > > > Great! > > > > > There is now a VERY noticeable difference in the amount of CPU that sshd > > > takes. The backup server is a PIII800. When doing a dump from a fast > > > client, with 3des I was looking at close to 40%-50% of CPU going to sshd on > > > the server. Now I see about 3%-5%. > > > > So how is the total throughput? Is it a win or a lose with the 7951? > > Excuse my curiosity: would measuring the throughput of a loopback ssh > link give a good estimate of this? Throughput is almost certainly going to be limited by the crypto h/w and to measure how fast that is you can use openssl speed -elapsed -evp des3 or run the cryptotest program (I just MFC'd it). Sam To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message