From owner-freebsd-doc Fri Feb 21 12:46:57 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6471037B405; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:46:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from crf-consulting.co.uk (pc-80-194-99-19-hy.blueyonder.co.uk [80.194.99.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C009543FBD; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:46:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nik@crf-consulting.co.uk) Received: from clan.nothing-going-on.org (clan.nothing-going-on.org [192.168.1.20]) by crf-consulting.co.uk (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h1LKkpaw062533; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:46:51 GMT (envelope-from nik@catkin) Received: from clan.nothing-going-on.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clan.nothing-going-on.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h1LKkom0039266; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:46:50 GMT (envelope-from nik@clan.nothing-going-on.org) Received: (from nik@localhost) by clan.nothing-going-on.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h1LKkovR039265; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:46:50 GMT Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:46:50 +0000 From: Nik Clayton To: Ceri Davies Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 5-Stable Roadmap and the docs Message-ID: <20030221204650.GP6403@clan.nothing-going-on.org> References: <20030221163750.GA25075@submonkey.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fjEAjMKpll6GDq3U" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030221163750.GA25075@submonkey.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: FreeBSD Project Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --fjEAjMKpll6GDq3U Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 04:37:50PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > Since at the moment RELENG_4 and CURRENT have some disparities, I think we > have three options: >=20 > i) Branch the doc/ tree; > > ii) Abandon the "doc/ reflects life with -stable" approach; >=20 > iii) Muddle through adding s, etc and get ourselves in a state. >=20 > Which one should we be going for ? (i) is likely to be a pain to manage. I don't think (ii) is realistic, given that we're not suggesting that people migrate en masse to 5.0 yet. Which leaves (iii)... > Also, I think now is a good time to kill all 2.x and 3.x stuff from > the docs. I could be convinced that 3.x should stay - I'm unshakeable > on 2.x, but that doesn't mean I'm about to barge ahead and do it. 2.x can go. I wouldn't personally lose sleep if we removed information that was solely pertinent to 3.x either. N --=20 FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.freebsd.org/ (__) FreeBSD Documentation Project http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/ \\\'',) \/ \= ^ --- 15B8 3FFC DDB4 34B0 AA5F 94B7 93A8 0764 2C37 E375 --- .\._/= _) --fjEAjMKpll6GDq3U Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+VpA5k6gHZCw343URAsKSAKCLwuJ/vikbhu3ZQFk1iyMI9VtO+wCeL96s 2QzTG+bL6+Ql+Ak0uvwmC8U= =B+6e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fjEAjMKpll6GDq3U-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message