From owner-freebsd-security Sat Sep 18 11:35:29 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8893E14D46 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 1999 11:35:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA12436; Sat, 18 Sep 1999 20:32:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Matthew Dillon Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , imp@village.org (Warner Losh), liam@tiora.net (Liam Slusser), kdrobnac@mission.mvnc.edu (Kenny Drobnack), Harry_M_Leitzell@cmu.edu (Harry M. Leitzell), security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BPF on in 3.3-RC GENERIC kernel In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 18 Sep 1999 11:19:09 PDT." <199909181819.LAA66207@apollo.backplane.com> Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 20:32:53 +0200 Message-ID: <12434.937679573@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <199909181819.LAA66207@apollo.backplane.com>, Matthew Dillon writes: > In regards to the jail call, I still strongly recommend that the syscall > be changed to take a sockaddr before it becomes too late, or we will blow > compatibility with IPV6 coming up in the near future. > > -Matt Until we know more about how IPv6 multihoming will work it is too early to say what kind of argument we will need to pass to jail(2) for IPv6. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message