From owner-freebsd-hardware  Wed Apr 16 12:20:11 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hardware>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA12384
          for hardware-outgoing; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 12:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolfe.net (mail1.wolfe.net [204.157.98.11])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA12198
          for <hardware@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 12:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gonzo.wolfenet.com (gonzo.wolfenet.com [204.157.98.2])
	by wolfe.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA02564;
	Wed, 16 Apr 1997 12:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (aroberts@localhost) by gonzo.wolfenet.com (8.8.3/8.7) with SMTP id MAA06050; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 12:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: gonzo.wolfenet.com: aroberts owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 12:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Aron T. Roberts" <aroberts@WOLFENET.com>
Reply-To: Aron Roberts <atr@pobox.com>
To: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" <michaelv@MindBender.serv.net>
cc: Thomas Arnold <tom@inna.net>, Doug Russell <drussell@saturn-tech.com>,
        Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>, Stephen Roome <steve@visint.co.uk>,
        Dave Alderman <dave@persprog.com>, hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Pentuim or Pentuim Pro ? 
In-Reply-To: <199704161749.KAA07608@MindBender.serv.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.95.970416121159.2259A-100000@gonzo.wolfenet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 16 Apr 1997, Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com wrote:

> 
> I don't know what benchmark you're using, but if you send it to me I
> can benchmark it on my Pentium Pro 200MHz (actually overclocked to
> 233, so that might be cheating :-), running NetBSD 1.2.  I also have a
> Cyrix 6x86 P166+, and can use a Pentium 133.  All are running NetBSD
> 1.2.

actaully I am not "using" any benchmark at the moment.. I have a pile of
parts and hopefully a spare few hours to do this.

I'm asking folks to let me know what benchmarks people want to see.. If
there is no interest I'll probably just run the usual stuff for my own
benefit. However if some folks are evaluating a purchase and have some
specific benchmarks they want to see.. send 'em my way... no promises but
I'll do my best.


aron