Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 14:00:14 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, thierry@herbelot.com, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Subject: Re: Porting NVidia linux kernel modules to FreeBSD Message-ID: <XFMail.010312140014.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10103120921460.24090-100000@inet.ssc.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12-Mar-01 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > Meaning, 3.3.6 + utah_glx outperforms by a factor of two 4.0.2 + DRI?! > > > > Or, even better, 4.0.2 + "suppose-we-managed-to-port-it nvidia kernel > module" + nvidia binary 'nvidia' replacement module for XFree-4's 'nv' > driver? I mean, will 336/utah be better?? No, nvidia's binary driver would be (a lot) faster. The Utah-GLX one doesn't direct render which slows it down a lot. (All the GL commands go through the X pipe) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.010312140014.doconnor>