From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 6 03:56:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA63106566B for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 03:56:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao107.cox.net (eastrmmtao107.cox.net [68.230.240.59]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154B08FC0C for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 03:56:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20100206035614.PVYC18765.eastrmmtao107.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 22:56:14 -0500 Received: from localhost ([68.103.37.153]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id eTwD1d0073JFCbG02TwDDk; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:56:14 -0500 X-VR-Score: -220.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=lmPhvh7Z1uYexRotBbyThyHQn0Wjfpw+wOzANOpiIo4= c=1 sm=1 a=qjS1E5aM3SIA:10 a=N4x68aYdfVlkKDflYggXRA==:17 a=M0VwM5ZyAAAA:8 a=q56oFxeYAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=BvnfIvPCBO6CC0kEohMA:9 a=57SRheJWls7B8-OqGirwFMMgcMkA:4 a=rA2IZWC8YWAA:10 a=k3S3GY7AwsAA:10 a=Xclt7nbD0wcA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=N4x68aYdfVlkKDflYggXRA==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: jhell References: <1781265383542@webmail54.yandex.ru> <20100205225039.GA81606@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:59:12 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Jeremy Messenger" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.10 (Linux) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, cvs-src@yandex.ru Subject: Re: Recent massive port update. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 03:56:15 -0000 On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:42:09 -0600, jhell wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:50, ertr1013@ wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 06:25:42PM +0300, cvs-src@yandex.ru wrote: >>> Hi there. >>> I see some massive port update in past hours, but not see what the >>> reason of it (nor on freebsd-ports@, nor on freshports.org). Can >>> anybody shed the light what was changed? >> >> The graphics/jpeg port was updated such that the version number of >> libjpeg.so was increased. This necessitated a revision bump in all the >> ports that depend on graphics/jpeg. There are *many* such ports. >> >> >> >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> [root@smeshariki2 ~]# portsnap fetch >>> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found. >>> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... done. >>> Fetching snapshot metadata... done. >>> Updating from Fri Feb 5 06:44:34 MSK 2010 to Fri Feb 5 15:57:40 MSK >>> 2010. >>> Fetching 4 metadata patches... done. >>> Applying metadata patches... done. >>> Fetching 0 metadata files... done. >>> Fetching 4282 patches..... >> > > > I could have swore that I recently heard an announcement that barred > this type of activity until after 7.3-RELEASE was made.... Read this: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2010-January/059241.html > Guess that doesn't stand for everything. Stick to package if you can't handle it. > Was there some type of security concern that caused this bump of jpeg in > the first place or was it just a creeping featurism? -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org