From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 29 03:46:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EA316A4CE for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 03:46:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 221A443D1F for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 03:46:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) id j0T3kXUR022198; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:46:33 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:46:33 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Doug Hardie Message-ID: <20050129034633.GC67138@dan.emsphone.com> References: <92b10f1a12e5aee27644c45171b5bd99@lafn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <92b10f1a12e5aee27644c45171b5bd99@lafn.org> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: f-questions List Subject: Re: Possible SCSI address conflicts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 03:46:34 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 28), Doug Hardie said: > FreeBSD 5.3-P5 with device atapicam in the kernel. > > From dmesg.boot: > > Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle > da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 > cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > > It looks like there is a scsi conflict. Both da0 and cd0 have the > bus numbers. I won't be back on site till next Friday to try the > drive. Is this an issue? Other than changing jumpers on the drives > is there a way to resolve it if needed? The bus number there is the bus number within the card; a dual-channel card will have two busses, all regular cards only have a "bus 0". If you run "camcontrol devlist" you'll see that they have different scbus numbers, so the kernel does know then apart :) -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com