From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 7 15:36:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E72137B401 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 15:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.liwing.de (mail.liwing.de [213.70.188.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D3943FDD for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 15:36:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rehsack@liwing.de) Received: (qmail 66102 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2003 22:36:41 -0000 Received: from stingray.liwing.de (HELO liwing.de) ([213.70.188.164]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.liwing.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Aug 2003 22:36:41 -0000 Message-ID: <3F32D479.4040100@liwing.de> Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 00:36:41 +0200 From: Jens Rehsack Organization: LiWing IT-Services User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Marcus Clarke References: <3F32B0D2.80002@liwing.de> <1060287238.721.58.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <1060287238.721.58.camel@gyros> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports cc: FreeBSD PortManager Subject: Re: m4-macros for different versions in /usr/local/share/aclocal? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 22:36:45 -0000 On 07.08.2003 22:13, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 16:04, Jens Rehsack wrote: > >> Hi, [...] >> One step could be, putting the aclocal self related macros >> into a directory which is ever named as the aclocal >> /usr/local/share/aclocal{14,15,17}/ version and put port >> additions ever to /usr/local/share/aclocal/. Or the ports >> put their additions to /usr/local/share/aclocal/${port}/ > > > I like this syntax better. > >> and eg. USE_LIBTOOL extends ACLOCAL_SEARCH_DIR to according >> directory. ACLOCAL_ARGS will be extended by the resulting >> search path, each dir prepended by the '-I' parameter >> (using REINPLACE). >> >> The consequence would be, that each of those ports must >> have a USE_${PORT} equivalent und bsd.port.mk (or included >> .mk of it, eg. bsd.gnome.mk). >> >> What does the rest of FreeBSD ports people think about that? > > > I agree with this, and I have suggested it to Ade. That is one of the When did you? Did he answer your recognization? > hang ups I'm running into with anjuta-devel. Oh, good. Somewhere to steal the solution from :-) > Joe Jens