From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 16 07:28:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831AF106564A for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 07:28:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nr1c0re@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8F48FC14 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 07:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwd6 with SMTP id 6so400559qwd.13 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:28:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FnrNoGVdHq3MWEEkKi1SBaf9MQLO9KeIduGOwi+T7GE=; b=IoDyQl4VaLIG3RavONPYiB0wz/ViFH1Iw5C6wcLoxIBpva2ZwQNmAEzDuDWB9rkzZK F9z+umnLRM6whute9GdZrZeVi4D3P+bCeUpocS1hOdHuT6VKeJUqKBGak0HGC94TCy8K TLtc5XqEj9uRc3sHS0Lj/671P7O7vG6CAIM04= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Bj53RnnvgnxesqkFj8eHeTWY3GiNoHcbas9AOf5iJJX2C4070/t8mu3Js99txNKScE 5ysU4ahy+xQdU46ge+mcT+DutcdaVpNEGip1EYl2tCfCSi5Yv3whbhu/Tz4slsazOwIc noV7ljL3Qgc8Pq/dakw1sHhbLYnDILEdwgxxw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.228.76 with SMTP id jd12mr5927155qcb.291.1289892502476; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:28:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.64.91 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:28:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101115122428.294dde4f@scorpio> References: <20101115090851.237f167b@scorpio> <20101115122428.294dde4f@scorpio> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:28:22 +0300 Message-ID: From: c0re To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: openssl version - how to verify X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 07:28:23 -0000 Jerry, I'm not about that :) base openssl are OK. But I need proves that it has got no security problems - it's external IT auditors request. And I'm interested how I can know what patchlevel there on base openssl version and prove them (auditors) that freebsd base openssl are not vulnerable. 2010/11/15 Jerry : > On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:40:27 +0300 > c0re articulated: > >> There are still too many broken ports with openssl from ports, I do >> not like debug it and really like to use base openssl, almost no >> difference. > > Might I suggest that if you are aware of ports that don't work > correctly with the port's version of openssl that you file a PR against > it. I have done so and succeeded in getting several patches issued to > correct the problem. This problem will not go away by itself. > > -- > Jerry =E2=9C=8C > FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net > > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. > __________________________________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >