Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 02:07:02 +0100 From: des@ofug.org (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WARNS=6 changes Message-ID: <xzp65qi94y1.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20030317005738.GN3819@elvis.mu.org> (Maxime Henrion's message of "Mon, 17 Mar 2003 01:57:38 %2B0100") References: <20030313192045.GG3819@elvis.mu.org> <20030316062315.GA75492@dragon.nuxi.com> <xzpof4bcu8b.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <xzpllzfctbx.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030316234507.GK3819@elvis.mu.org> <xzpznnuq2xw.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030317001100.GM3819@elvis.mu.org> <xzpbs0a95mz.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030317005738.GN3819@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org> writes: > You must have not read my patch correctly. The only difference it > causes is for WARNS=6 programs. It does not break the tree at all, > and I do have tested it. If it only sets -std for WARNS=6, it's useless, because most of our tree does not and will never build at WARNS level 6. In the meantime, the parts of our tree which would build fine at WARNS level 5 if only the "C89 does not support long long" warnings would go away are still out in the cold. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp65qi94y1.fsf>