From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Mar 12 06:20:32 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA14049
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 12 Mar 1997 06:20:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA14037
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 1997 06:20:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id GAA00664; Wed, 12 Mar 1997 06:20:37 -0800 (PST)
To: Klaus Werner Krygier <krygier@kph.uni-mainz.de>
cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: NFSV3 - NFS on FreeBSD 2.2 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 12 Mar 1997 10:37:58 +0100."
             <Pine.BSF.3.95.970312091831.9987A-100000@krygierpc.kph.uni-mainz.de> 
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 1997 06:20:37 -0800
Message-ID: <660.858176437@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> With several snapshots and also the last recent 2.2-GAMMA-releases
> I found, that the operating systems has a lot of good features and
> works very fine. But I have one severe problem: FreeBSD supports now
> NFS Version 3 which seems to be buggy. Especially using a FreeBSD
> machine as NFSV3 server and DEC-Alpha systems running Digital Unix as
> NFSV3 clients results in a very strange behaviour.

We know. :-)

People are working on this right now, and I do hope that it will be
fixed soon, but for now it really would be a good idea if you just
used NFS v2 with 2.2.  That seems to work just fine.

					Jordan