From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Mon Aug 31 04:25:50 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A81A3D532D for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 04:25:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Bfxvy0t23z41dG for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 04:25:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1C0F03D514C; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 04:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC603D54BA for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 04:25:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bfxvx6mmqz420d for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 04:25:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7F6421F68 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 04:25:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07V4Pnjd042272 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 04:25:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07V4PncD042271 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 04:25:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 249024] cmake.mk: Add USES=cmake:testing to facilitate defining test targets for cmake-based ports Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 04:25:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Ports Framework X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tcberner@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kde@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 04:25:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D249024 Tobias C. Berner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcberner@freebsd.org --- Comment #2 from Tobias C. Berner --- Moin moin=20 I like the idea in principal, I myself looked at adding these targets a few years ago, and lbartoletti@ had the same idea a few weeks back. However... The reason kde@ never added those targets is, that up to a few years ago, K= DE had unit tests which assumed you are *not* running the build as root (which most port builds are).=20 They did funny things in the spirit of "rm -r /etc" as a "failing test case= ", which of course when running the `make test` as root, would pretty much ruin your day. And of course, took quite a lot of time to figure out that a test-case was doing it. So, while I technically think this new target is a good idea, with the memo= ry of a broken system, I kind of does do not want this, out of fear that other upstreams are doing similar assumptions about the rights of a user running = the tests. mfg Tobias --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=