From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Apr 10 5:57:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from tux.multiweb.net (tux.multiweb.net [195.114.253.251]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA73514FC7 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 1999 05:57:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joker@tux.multiweb.nl) Received: from beast.tux.nl (joker@beast.tux.nl [192.168.56.3]) by tux.multiweb.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA11091; Sat, 10 Apr 1999 14:55:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 14:55:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Stijn Jonker X-Sender: joker@beast.tux.nl To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Checkpoint FireWall-1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 10 Apr 1999, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > On 10-Apr-99 Stijn Jonker wrote: > > > Nokia has launched an integrated firewall router solution based on > > freebsd & checkpoint Firewall-1. > > This one exists for quite some time now as readers of the firewall list > know. I know i'm supporting it in my job... > > > The question now is is checkpoint firewall-1 available for freebsd as > > seperate product? if not you guys could make a point at checkpoint or > > nokia to release it seperate... > > AFAIK it's not available seperately. I think that Nokia did a lot of custom > engineering that would need some tweaks with FreeBSD in order to work. And > anyways, they are not obliged to make a seperate product from it if they > don't choose to. We could however at least refer to the firewall product > within the advocacy project. > Well going to try, i installed freebsd just now.. > [ snip of friendly .sig ] ;) Sorry started using Linux, and well it's hard to switch.. But i might get the hang of freebsd. Then i might try the switch.. Met Vriendelijke groet/Yours Sincerly Stijn Jonker Signature removed. For ethical reasons ;-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message