From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 22 18:53:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9F737B401 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 18:53:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kyoto-inet.or.jp (smtp.kyoto-inet.or.jp [202.245.160.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56B843F3F for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 18:53:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Received: from debussy.private.org (25.60.138.210.bn.2iij.net [210.138.60.25]) by smtp.kyoto-inet.or.jp (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6N1rth9061307; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:53:55 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by debussy.private.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6N1ssDw057446; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:54:54 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:54:54 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20030723.105454.576022302.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> To: giffunip@yahoo.com From: Nakata Maho In-Reply-To: <20030722181747.57580.qmail@web13405.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20030722181747.57580.qmail@web13405.mail.yahoo.com> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on XEmacs 21.4.13 (Rational FORTRAN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc version and cad/tochnog X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 01:53:57 -0000 Hi, Pedro and all, > Perhaps someone can confirm if tochnog builds without defining USE_GCC on > current? > > I developed it on 5.0R (gcc 3.2.1) and it builds with gcc 3.3 too, but > previously it was reported broken on 5.1R unless gcc-2.95 was used. Hopefully > it builds on current so we could change it to use the default gcc always? I also need other person's help too. With my 5.1-CURRENT (with gcc-3.2) it failed... --maho