From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Mon Mar 2 21:00:46 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB00E25A933 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:00:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48WXbx4G6Dz4chM; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:00:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 022L0TeB051508 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:00:30 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: jkim@FreeBSD.org Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 022L0RhX021188 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 3 Mar 2020 04:00:27 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: svn commit: r358411 - head/contrib/sendmail/src To: Jung-uk Kim , Hajimu UMEMOTO References: <202002272202.01RM20j9030410@repo.freebsd.org> <525c9e77-9b86-ba95-ede5-54f3bbbb1aa7@grosbein.net> <9eb3986d-3726-300d-506f-8051a3a84728@grosbein.net> <66b377d6-cb80-ef9a-c87f-fcb893b9d631@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 04:00:21 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48WXbx4G6Dz4chM X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.94 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; IP_SCORE(-1.84)[ip: (-5.11), ipnet: 2a01:4f8::/29(-2.54), asn: 24940(-1.56), country: DE(-0.02)]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 21:00:46 -0000 02.03.2020 21:29, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >>> You can easily repeat the problem using recent ports tree and >>> recent stable/11 and handbook-recommended way. >> >> Mixing base and ports OpenSSLs is a bad idea. If you decided to >> build some ports with ports OpenSSL for some reason, every ports >> using OpenSSL should be rebuilt with it to avoid this mayhem. > > And vice versa, i.e., every port using OpenSSL should be rebuilt if > you decided to go back to base OpenSSL. One more time: these days it is not possible. There are ports that need new 1.1.1 API and cannot be used with stable/11 using base SSL, there is no choice. That's why base sendmail needs to use new SSL API too.