From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 3 16:25:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77CBC697 for ; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 16:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6001D21E3 for ; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 16:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s73GPSC0044705 for ; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 16:25:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 188808] New port: science/sigrok-firmware-utils Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 16:25:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: uffe@uffe.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Patch Ready X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 16:25:28 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188808 --- Comment #8 from uffe@uffe.org --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #7) > good, but I didn't see the stage-qa section in this log so I guess it was a > regular poudriere run. In any case, moving to patch-ready... The poudriere log is the result of a "poudriere testport" run just like the others. I cannot really explain why it does not have a stage-qa section. This port differs from a normal port in the way that it does not download and build any source - all files are found inside the port itself in the files dir - I guess that this is the factor that comes in play here... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.