From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Mar 13 03:31:34 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id DAA24163
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 03:31:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pain.csrv.uidaho.edu (root@pain.csrv.uidaho.edu [129.101.114.109])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA24156
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 03:31:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pain.csrv.uidaho.edu (fn@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pain.csrv.uidaho.edu (8.7.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id DAA01053 for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 03:31:30 -0800 (PST)
To: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: finger and 2.2-960303-SNAP 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 13 Mar 1996 00:46:25 PST."
             <199603130846.AAA03007@precipice.shockwave.com> 
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 03:31:29 -0800
Message-ID: <1047.826716689@pain.csrv.uidaho.edu>
From: Faried Nawaz <fn@pain.csrv.uidaho.edu>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


Paul Traina wrote...
   
   No, it's actually better if the bug reports come to US first.  The reason
   being that most vendors would say "pshaw, you guys are idiots." whereas
   there are a bunch of us on the mailing list who can point to the exact
   bits of trivia in RFC-793 and sample "killer packets" to get these guys to
   fix their TCP implementation.

for xylogics/annex it's annex_support@xylogics.com i believe.  any ideas on
how i should compose my `bug report'?  i've never really done this before.


faried.