From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Dec 9 15:18:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from tank.skynet.be (tank.skynet.be [195.238.2.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF7C14CC8; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 15:18:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [194.78.238.58] (dialup890.brussels2.skynet.be [194.78.238.58]) by tank.skynet.be (8.9.3/odie-relay-v1.0) with ESMTP id AAA10851; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 00:17:42 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@foxbert.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 00:17:26 +0100 To: Julian Elischer , Joe Greco From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: Route table leaks Cc: Bob Vaughan , freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net, mike@sentex.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG, jdp@polstra.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 3:00 PM -0800 1999/12/9, Julian Elischer wrote: > so can it be committed? In -CURRENT, I would say that this could probably be committed, if John feels safe. I am not yet convinced that it should be committed to -STABLE, although things do look good so far. -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ____________________________________________________________________ |o| Brad Knowles, Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o| |o| Systems Architect, News & FTP Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o| |o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.11.11/12.49 B-1140 Brussels |o| |o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o| \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside. Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message