From owner-cvs-all  Mon Dec 14 20:40:02 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA08198
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Mon, 14 Dec 1998 20:40:02 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA08159;
          Mon, 14 Dec 1998 20:39:59 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com)
Received: (from dillon@localhost)
	by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id UAA51106;
	Mon, 14 Dec 1998 20:39:40 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dillon)
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 20:39:40 -0800 (PST)
From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Message-Id: <199812150439.UAA51106@apollo.backplane.com>
To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Cc: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>, Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>,
        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/isa labpc.c 
References:  <199812150420.UAA02573@dingo.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

    You guys are being silly.  Short of rewriting the kernel entirely we
    can definitely assume that NULL is bitwise 0.  Not only that, but we
    can make assumptions about the relationship between (void *) and 
    (anyothertype *) as well.  There is nothing wrong with being pragmatic
    if it means a hundred people will be actively developing for the code
    instead of just two or three.

					-Matt

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message