From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 3 01:51:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118291F4; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 01:51:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevlo@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ns.kevlo.org (kevlo.org [220.128.136.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90577BDA; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 01:51:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from srg.kevlo.org (ns.kevlo.org [220.128.136.52]) by ns.kevlo.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r331phex076686; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:51:43 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from kevlo@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <515B8B37.9000807@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:51:51 +0800 From: Kevin Lo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130207 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin Subject: Re: Re: svn commit: r248997 - head/sys/conf References: <201304020557.r325vbnA069100@svn.freebsd.org> <201304021234.00772.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201304021234.00772.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 01:51:55 -0000 On 2013/04/03 00:34, John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 1:57:37 am Kevin Lo wrote: >> Author: kevlo >> Date: Tue Apr 2 05:57:36 2013 >> New Revision: 248997 >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248997 >> >> Log: >> Add VIMAGE to NOTES. >> >> Reviewed by: zec >> >> Modified: >> head/sys/conf/NOTES > Hmm, we've intentionally not done that to date (see how x86 conf Makefiles > create separate LINT-VIMAGE configs). It might be good to keep these but > comment them out? We need to build both LINTS to get good coverage. Ok, fixed. Thanks for pointing that out. > Also, I thought VIMAGE wasn't known to be buildable on non-x86? > I'm not sure if VIMAGE doesn't support on non-x86 arches. I'll try it out on my ARM platform. Kevin