From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 8 02:30:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: performance@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDD116A431; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 02:30:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from delphij@frontfree.net) Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org (tarsier.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BDEC43E0E; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 02:01:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from delphij@frontfree.net) Received: from beastie.frontfree.net (unknown [219.239.99.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389F3EB4F35; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 10:01:34 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost.frontfree.net [127.0.0.1]) by beastie.frontfree.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51021391FD; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 10:01:32 +0800 (CST) Received: from beastie.frontfree.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (beastie.frontfree.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 70526-12; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 10:01:24 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.217.12.83] (unknown [61.135.152.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by beastie.frontfree.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F891139173; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 10:01:23 +0800 (CST) From: Xin LI To: Suleiman Souhlal In-Reply-To: <01F3BA1C-C7C6-41C7-AFE8-675FA972D1A3@FreeBSD.org> References: <01F3BA1C-C7C6-41C7-AFE8-675FA972D1A3@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-K19JSnonNJgCgtZ+X8tQ" Organization: The FreeBSD Simplified Chinese Project Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 10:01:17 +0800 Message-Id: <1123466477.767.2.camel@spirit> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at frontfree.net Cc: gnn@FreeBSD.org, performance@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Tarball of ported libmicro 0.3 available for testing... X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 02:30:40 -0000 --=-K19JSnonNJgCgtZ+X8tQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =E5=9C=A8 2005-08-08=E4=B8=80=E7=9A=84 03:15 +0200=EF=BC=8CSuleiman Souhlal= =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Hello, >=20 > On Aug 6, 2005, at 3:25 PM, gnn@freebsd.org wrote: >=20 > > I plan to make a port of this this weekend, but would like some > > feedback on this set of benchmarks. If they're useful I think we > > should make them part of a nightly benchmarking strategy. >=20 > In case you're interested, I ran it on a dual p4 xeon (without =20 > HyperThreading) from the netperf cluster, to compare the performance =20 > of RELENG_5, RELENG_6 and HEAD. > You can find the results at http://people.freebsd.org/~ssouhlal/stuff/=20 > compare_tiger-3.html . > It shows that RELENG_6 and HEAD are (in these tests) almost never =20 > slower than RELENG_5, and often more than 20% faster. Great work! BTW. Is there any clue about why pthread_128 looks slower than RELENG_5 and then recovered in HEAD? Cheers, --=20 Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/ --=-K19JSnonNJgCgtZ+X8tQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC9rzt/cVsHxFZiIoRAjpIAJ0Tzvs+ajWMOL94JnvQWDPUkq+lKwCdGXG+ b5EGNy0VTm+5e2ePUwJE2AY= =Psra -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-K19JSnonNJgCgtZ+X8tQ--