From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 15 14:38:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9A116A4CE for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:38:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D16943D2F for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:38:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Shadow333@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2005 14:38:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO there) (62.218.246.180) by mail.gmx.net (mp014) with SMTP; 15 Feb 2005 15:38:53 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1027147 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Oliver Leitner Organization: none To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F6rn=20K=F6nig?= Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:33:14 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: <20050215140847.6AE35CCD824@mail.alpha-tierchen.de> In-Reply-To: <20050215140847.6AE35CCD824@mail.alpha-tierchen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Message-Id: <20050215143854.7D16943D2F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 ports security/nessus broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:38:55 -0000 cvsup -z -g -L 2 portsupdatefile today at 10am, which has been 6hrs30minutes ago portsupdatefile entry: ports-all nessus-gtk2-2.2.2a < needs updating (port has 2.2.3) nessus-libnasl-2.2.2a < needs updating (port has 2.2.3) nessus-libraries-2.2.2a < needs updating (port has 2.2.3) is yours up to date? =) cheers Oliver On Tuesday 15 February 2005 15:09, Björn König wrote: > Oliver Leitner wrote: > > <185> if(plug_get_launch(args) != LAUNCH_DISABLED || > > <186> category == ACT_INIT || > > <187> (category == ACT_SETTINGS)) /* can we launch it ? > > */ > > > <188> { > > nessus-2.2.2a builds fine for me and does not use > LAUNCH_DISABLED in line 185. Are your ports up to date? > > Regards > Björn -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse.