From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 17 07:59:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D6B16A404 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 07:59:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from current@dino.sk) Received: from mail.netlab.sk (mail.netlab.sk [213.215.72.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E676043D70 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 07:59:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from current@dino.sk) Received: from [192.168.16.13] (home.dino.sk [213.215.74.194]) (AUTH: PLAIN milan@netlab.sk, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by mail.netlab.sk with esmtp; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:05:06 +0200 id 00289C12.446AD932.0001693E From: Milan Obuch To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:59:32 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200605160920.33323.current@dino.sk> <20060516085912.GA88689@walton.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: <20060516085912.GA88689@walton.maths.tcd.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605170959.33082.current@dino.sk> Subject: Re: Weird thing - pciconf reading differs in two systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 07:59:45 -0000 On Tuesday 16 May 2006 10:59, David Malone wrote: > On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 09:20:32AM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote: > > This makes me wonder - how could the same card be identified as two > > different devices? I tested the same card, then another one and the > > result is the same. Working in my tablet, not working in WRAP. There is > > one difference, however - kernel in WRAP has ath built-in, in my tablet I > > am kldloading it. > > Could be loose connections in the WRAP - if some of the pins are not > connected properly that could result in 0xff showing up in various > places (or worse). > > David. > I do not think it's the case. I did test it with two boards, in three slots. Were it loose connector, it would not be for any combination of card/slot on WRAP, but not else. I will try it once more, on some other machine/other boards and we'll see the result. Milan -- No need to mail me directly. Just reply to mailing list, please.