From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 17 16:50:22 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF619A5B for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kaywinnit.conundrum.com (smtp.conundrum.com [IPv6:2001:4900:1:213::2:20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A791114FD for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chani.conundrum.com ([216.235.10.34]) by kaywinnit.conundrum.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1W4Ccc-0005uH-77; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:50:18 +0000 Subject: Re: pkg install: what is the "first" repository? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Matthew Pounsett In-Reply-To: <52D8D27B.2030804@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:50:10 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4C903D47-8D62-4986-B8E6-EB24DCE49E3E@conundrum.com> References: <48811877-E688-4E0F-AF26-57C1C0135314@conundrum.com> <52D8D27B.2030804@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: Matthew Seaman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mailing List" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:50:22 -0000 On Jan 17, 2014, at 01:49 , Matthew Seaman = wrote: > Note that there are changes in the pipeline which will make a > significant difference to the way pkg selects which repository to pull = a > package from, as part of a complete revision of how dependency solving > works. Yeah, I can think of cases where the current selection rules would = result in breakage without significant manual intervention. For one = thing, it would be beneficial if, for any package that has dependencies, = pkg preferred getting the dependencies from the same repo as the = original package, regardless of any other ordering rules. What=92s the best place to watch for those changes making it to release? = Is there a PR I can pay attention to?