From owner-freebsd-doc Thu Sep 12 08:14:02 1996 Return-Path: owner-doc Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA10235 for doc-outgoing; Thu, 12 Sep 1996 08:14:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tokyonet-entrance.astec.co.jp (tokyonet-entrance.astec.co.jp [202.239.16.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA10216 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 1996 08:13:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from amont.astec.co.jp (amont.astec.co.jp [172.20.10.1]) by tokyonet-entrance.astec.co.jp (8.6.12+2.5Wb7/3.4Wbeta5-astecMX2.3) with ESMTP id AAA12027; Fri, 13 Sep 1996 00:13:52 +0900 Received: from astec.co.jp (hanaigw [192.168.23.1]) by amont.astec.co.jp (8.6.9+2.4W/3.4Wbeta5-astecNoMX2.3) with ESMTP id AAA21427; Fri, 13 Sep 1996 00:13:50 +0900 Received: from tau (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astec.co.jp (8.7.5/3.5Wbeta-ppp) with ESMTP id AAA01303; Fri, 13 Sep 1996 00:11:49 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199609121511.AAA01303@astec.co.jp> To: jfieber@indiana.edu Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New conversion scheme in place. In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 9 Sep 1996 11:41:14 -0500 (EST)" References: X-Mailer: Mew version 1.06 on Emacs 19.28.1, Mule 2.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 00:11:49 +0900 From: Hiroyuki Hanai Sender: owner-doc@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Sorry to be late... John Fieber wrote: > Yes, from the web server. For each > http://www.freebsd.org/tutorials/foo/foo.html, there is an > http://www.freebsd.org/tutorials/foo/foo.sgml. Thank you. I've gotten them. > > We also have big TODO!, which is to include our Japanese version of > > handbook in the FreeBSD source tree but we don't have clear vision > > to do it. > > I've been thinking about this too. I've got some ideas, but am > open to suggestions. We(Japanese Documentation team) are discussing about this and I can send you our proposal in a few days. > groff 1.10. Groff 1.10 which was just brought into current. I'd > personally rather not take on the task of bringing the patches > into -current. Would anyone like to take responsibility for > investigating and ultimately implementing this? I'm looking for but so far I cannot find the person who can maintain and be responsible for (j)groff. If I cannot find in a few weeks, I'm going to try reading the source codes and the japanization patch, and I will tell you whether we can be responsible for groff. > Regardless, we can still generate html for Japanese documents > with or without j-groff. Yes!! > Dropping the 8th bit is no longer Politically Correct. ;-) (^_^) -----H.Hanai