From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 16 14:23:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DBB37B84A; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 14:23:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA92807; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 14:23:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 14:23:11 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Cc: Jamie Norwood , Oleg Ogurok , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: which branch? In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.20000316151715.00b7f4f0@207.227.119.2> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote: > Not to start a big discussion on the release process (again), but for the > QA team's sake there should be a day or 3 delay between the release tag and > the grand send off to allow time for 11th hour problems. The few more > problematic I saw were fixed. A minor ones remain, but need to rule out > hardware/pilot error and none should be show stoppers for anyone. This is exactly what happened ;-) > For those with non-critical needs I heartily recommend 4.0 release or > stable. Much, much better than 3.0R's debut. Agreed. Kris ---- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message