From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May 28 20:26:21 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D411106566C;
	Sat, 28 May 2011 20:26:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from brucec@muon.cran.org.uk)
Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk
	[IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C558FC16;
	Sat, 28 May 2011 20:26:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id B0FC1E6300; Sat, 28 May 2011 21:26:19 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 21:26:19 +0100
From: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk>
To: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20110528202619.GA27204@muon.cran.org.uk>
References: <20110527115147.GA73802@freebsd.org>
	<3BF63174-1B29-4A4D-96DD-3ED65ED96EAC@bsdimp.com>
	<20110527181459.GA29908@freebsd.org>
	<20110527182906.GA31871@freebsd.org> <86oc2mlsey.fsf@gmail.com>
	<20110528182326.GA75447@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110528182326.GA75447@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG,
	Pan Tsu <inyaoo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc] a few kern.mk and bsd.sys.mk related changes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain
	<freebsd-toolchain.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-toolchain-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-toolchain>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-toolchain-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-toolchain-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 20:26:21 -0000

On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 06:23:26PM +0000, Alexander Best wrote:
> 
> well i'm not an expert on this. but are we 100% sure that a kernel on amd64
> compiled with -O2 frename-registers can be debugged the same way as one with
> -O? if that is the case: sure...-O2 is fine. ;)
> 
> however i've often read messages - mostly by bruce evans - claiming that
> anything greater than -O will in fact decrease a kernel's ability to be
> debugged just as well as a kernel with -O.
> 

The critical option when -O2 is used is -fno-omit-frame-pointers, since removing
frame pointers makes debugging impossible (on i386). With -O2 code is moved around and
removed, so debugging is more difficult, but can still provide useful
information.

-- 
Bruce Cran