From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Feb 9 21:44:49 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id VAA02310 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 9 Feb 1995 21:44:49 -0800 Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id VAA02304 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 1995 21:44:37 -0800 Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA07849 (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Thu, 9 Feb 1995 23:08:21 -0600 Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA00903; 9 Feb 95 21:02:43 CST (Thu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) with SMTP id VAA00899; Thu, 9 Feb 1995 21:02:41 -0600 Message-Id: <199502100302.VAA00899@bonkers.taronga.com> X-Authentication-Warning: bonkers.taronga.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Cc: davidg@Root.COM, jmb@kryten.atinc.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: MIT SHM X11 extensions? (fwd) In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 06 Feb 95 16:39:10 MST." <9502062339.AA07346@cs.weber.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.4.1 7/21/94 Date: Thu, 09 Feb 1995 21:02:36 -0600 From: Peter da Silva Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Uh, why is ETXTBUSY still around? What else would you do if you opened a currently running executable for writing? (ETXTBUSY on delete is bogus, and I hope FreeBSD 2.x has dumped that, but there's really no alternative on open than things that have surprising consequences)