Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 May 2013 09:56:14 -0400
From:      Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org>
To:        George Neville-Neil <gnn@freebsd.org>
Cc:        rstone@freebsd.org, freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: adding SDT probe functions with 6+ DTrace arguments
Message-ID:  <20130530135601.GA1631@gloom.sandvine.com>
In-Reply-To: <9900CFFB-6E68-4034-805A-859A937179EF@freebsd.org>
References:  <20130530040705.GA40320@gloom> <CALWP=0aRG5zjcNBJsgA0gwp9x8J_gxEtagfVy3JfK2ePC0J0jA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BXzFFjOE7y4QueSuqw8zcWMWk7pVyGKifZwgbZcANXYpKrVyA@mail.gmail.com> <9900CFFB-6E68-4034-805A-859A937179EF@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:02:54AM -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote:
> 
> On May 30, 2013, at 2:14 , Brendan Gregg <brendan.gregg@joyent.com> wrote:
> 
> > G'Day Mark,
> > 
> > As this might be interesting: to check that DTRACE_PROBE7 worked, in
> > Solaris I had added an sdt:::test probe, which could be invoked by the
> > DTrace test suite (sdt/tst.sdtargs.c) by calling uadmin() with A_SDTTEST:
> > 
> >        case A_SDTTEST:
> >        {
> >                DTRACE_PROBE7(test, int, 1, int, 2, int, 3, int, 4, int, 5,
> >                    int, 6, int, 7);
> >                break;
> >        }
> > 
> > Getting the tcp and ip providers working will be great.
> > 
> 
> Chiming in late.  Yes, let's extend the SDT macros in line with what we've done
> already.  This will also make it easy to MFC to 9 and 8.

Ok, thanks. I'll commit them later today. The network providers depend
on them, so I wanted to get them in first as well as fix the bugs
mentioned in my other email on this thread.

-Mark



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130530135601.GA1631>