Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 10:13:03 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>, scrappy@hub.org Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Benchmark: NetBSD 2.0 beats FreeBSD 5.3 Message-ID: <20050109101127.K35832@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050108202605.GA30807@walton.maths.tcd.ie> References: <41DE4F3D.8050509@syskonnect.de> <20050107091004.83732.qmail@web52710.mail.yahoo.com> <20050108135526.GQ49329@submonkey.net> <20050108202605.GA30807@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, David Malone wrote: DM> On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 01:21:14PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote: DM> > Any idea what type of impact this patch would have on say, a large qmail DM> > server that's drowning in context-switches? DM> DM> It will depend on how many processes you have running at any one DM> moment and how often processes are created/destroyed. From the look DM> of the graphs, you won't really be able to tell unless there are DM> significantly more than 1000 processes running at any moment. Then perhaps someone like scrappy@ should test it on one of his hosting planets ;-) Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050109101127.K35832>