From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Sep 7 9:30: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA0837B423 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 09:30:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id JAA63672; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 09:30:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 09:30:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200009071630.JAA63672@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Matthew Jacob Subject: Re: bin/21093: New option for restore (patch) Reply-To: Matthew Jacob Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/21093; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Matthew Jacob To: Stefan Moeding Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/21093: New option for restore (patch) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 09:21:26 -0700 (PDT) IMO, this is not sufficient enough reason to add the feature. On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Stefan Moeding wrote: > Matthew Jacob writes: > > > Other than making this look like Tru64's changes, why is this desirable? > > To avoid the (IMHO!) awkward subshell. > > Stefan > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message