From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 14 18:11:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169F4F8E for ; Tue, 14 May 2013 18:11:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grarpamp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4842FAB for ; Tue, 14 May 2013 18:11:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id ia10so926881vcb.13 for ; Tue, 14 May 2013 11:11:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=MLG1zXguC+rLzb0YtU0b/UoIz6Yg05JfQ9cxe4INVMg=; b=hbFWTAEN9Gr/FDelPDuChXkb3SCjBHF9bCrFyz0YNMLKqRocaFcpflpsIrrGgNlwG6 nNlCSJkmHsEPsPJIp/QJojY/9Cu7UASEIhWMEt8+A03AyV0/ixfSxxVo4elZU8406FDb bzpYml/6bncQSKCE6bPxJp9WmVP3I6Gd9QUYcxN4o7iGe4CNwOlEBf+tWvDnHi/HbQCN Z+oNJSYtmdrsbFqcDK6QxS8poFTglQrg77zF+lFJhJUarT/HXF9+xp7lGJU7WWfleKHR Q3mlvPQQbekifK0UdBvV8FhT72VyQZmCjJUmcy+pBnBHlj3vDVlKpdf2YQj5g56eei6G QwXQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.69.200 with SMTP id g8mr1723439vdu.4.1368555108044; Tue, 14 May 2013 11:11:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.115.7 with HTTP; Tue, 14 May 2013 11:11:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 14:11:47 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Binary Packages Are Available Again From: grarpamp To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 18:11:49 -0000 In an announcement it was said... > We are now glad to announce that binary packages available again for > 8.x, 9.x branches on i386 and amd64 architectures Note that the packages for ""8.x"", ie: "packages-8-stable" on i386 and amd64, are still 7-8 months old. Other than that, I'm sure it's just a miswording/oversight in the announcement/process. There's also this curiously named remnant which could be removed: ports/i386/packages-9.0-stable