Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Aug 2001 20:42:39 +0900
From:      non@ever.sanda.gr.jp
To:        stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: PC Card memory window 
Message-ID:  <20010823204239K.non@ever.sanda.gr.jp>
In-Reply-To: <200108230755.f7N7tUW82259@harmony.village.org>
References:  <200108230213.f7N2DAW80334@harmony.village.org> <20010822231852Q.non@ever.sanda.gr.jp> <200108230755.f7N7tUW82259@harmony.village.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 20:13:10 -0600
> : nsp0 at port 0x240-0x24f iomem 0xc8800-0xc97ff irq 5 slot 0 on pccard0
> :                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Nothing should have changed in the memory allocation scheme.  The
> above address looks wrong to me.  Maybe it was with the addition of
> the orm device and that 0xc8000 was taken.  Maybe we're not aligning
> things properly (since the memory needs to be 4k aligned, iirc, at the
> bridge level).
> 
> Do you have a orm device?  If so, what does it say?

Yes,
jm3wud@cel% dmesg | grep orm
orm0: <Option ROMs> at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff,0xc8000-0xc87ff on isa0

But if my memory is correct, iomem used to be 0xd0000- something. And
the line,
memory  0xd4000  96k
in /etc/defautls/pccard.conf seems to be ignored,

From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 01:55:30 -0600
> Maybe this patch will help?

Unfortunately, no. Dmesg was same,
nsp0 at port 0x240-0x24f iomem 0xc8800-0xc97ff irq 5 slot 0 on pccard0

The lines of PCIC from dmesg was as follows,

pcic2: <Vadem 469> at port 0x3e0-0x3e1 on isa0
pcic2: Polling mode
pccard0: <PC Card bus (classic)> on pcic2
pccard1: <PC Card bus (classic)> on pcic2

// Noriaki Mitsunaga //

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010823204239K.non>