From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 9 14:24:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155B216A4CE for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 14:24:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail3.speakeasy.net (mail3.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA8043D2F for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 14:24:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 6315 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2004 14:24:17 -0000 Received: from dsl027-160-063.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender ) encrypted SMTP for ; 9 Jun 2004 14:24:17 -0000 Received: from 10.50.41.233 (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i59EODVa018208; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:24:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:55:45 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <53993.1086779790@critter.freebsd.dk> <20040609124308.GC11475@green.homeunix.org> In-Reply-To: <20040609124308.GC11475@green.homeunix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406090955.49190.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on server.baldwin.cx cc: Brian Feldman cc: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: dev_t / udev_t confusion ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 14:24:22 -0000 On Wednesday 09 June 2004 08:43 am, Brian Feldman wrote: > On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:16:30PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > [...] > > The change proposed is more or less to do: > > s/dev_t/struct cdev */ > > s/udev_t/dev_t/ > > over all the kernel sources (366 files or so). > > [....] > > One yes vote, please. The dev_t structure is not treated as opaque, > so as long as people are going to->dereference it, it deserves to be > a struct *. Seconded. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org