From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 26 15:19:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63803A69 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 15:19:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@kraus-haus.org) Received: from mail-qa0-x234.google.com (mail-qa0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263061ED3 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 15:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id hg5so236242qab.18 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:19:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=dE2BaTE+VadNLvG2Fj9C7YhuHsmIVe9T4FVW16uOdAs=; b=nfRUS2eTlAnPRZq95gLcw1GhbETlmUlCNuqJVlqhXvP4nXq5gUREc/g1IkqPl/iotK jUVUxwC6kHBxqwOCqIRq1vB2NKqyd5a/eQ1e2NkPttS756z4dTOnDpmWEp38CPnH5OWy 2YloYNChBTD9sTjDpPq2+qwzhz2nxXoyMzDbo84GW6j+QHDpESENhqCclrrmr/R1LNYe jtOkZmSM2D4hYEfWWq2/Syg+aZ7Ae9p9x+KcEEJ9KaKcuBQNWP+vtNE3gGpxBJoCD4A4 qURICZ9OfgQXEJkOUPh/bjuILPKI25v4boVHJky5tAEVrrbe2auFNbjb1N0P0Iz/9HnZ IDsQ== X-Received: by 10.224.180.206 with SMTP id bv14mr40587448qab.56.1366989549573; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:19:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mbp1.kraus-haus.org (mail.thecreativeadvantage.com. [96.236.16.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m8sm17541935qav.8.2013.04.26.08.19.08 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:19:08 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: 9.1 Postfix problem Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Paul Kraus In-Reply-To: <44a9oxtfqv.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:19:07 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <30C9C6FB-25A3-4DEB-882B-C8E01CE3DB49@kraus-haus.org> References: <459A07BB-BAD9-413D-83BA-D66BA04744B1@kraus-haus.org> <44a9oxtfqv.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> To: Lowell Gilbert X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm6FyLEfKMwcnRGozMNBmBG8nySr2BWlZGu8MgyeUKkRPF9kSiyPVdHRWStdVTSDJ4WXJOh Cc: bapt@freebsd.org, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" , jgh@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 15:19:10 -0000 On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Lowell Gilbert = wrote: > Paul Kraus writes: >=20 >> When building postfix under 91. I am running into an odd >> problem. I use the INST_BASE option, which seems to cause the problem >> (it worked fine with 9.0). The 'make' goes fine, but the 'make >> install' fails when trying to install the startup script to >> /usr/etc/rc.d instead of /etc/rc.d. It works fine if INST-BASE is >> disabled. I looked through the Makefile but could not suss out how >> that difference in configuration was actually causing the problem. >>=20 >> Has anyone else run into this problem and what was the fix (or = did you just install into /usr/local) ? >=20 > I use /usr/local, but this seems to be a typo in the last checkin,=20 > which changed the internal names of the port options to our brave new > naming scheme.=20 >=20 > If you look in the Makefile clause for installing to base, renaming = the > option itself went correctly, but both halves of the '.if' now invoke > USE_RC_SUBR. That's correct for PREFIX, but for installing into base > should be USE_RCORDER instead. Lowell, That was exactly the problem. I knew it was in the installation = configuration *somewhere*, but I just could not find it. Thanks. Should I report this as a bug in the postfix port ? -- Paul Kraus Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3 Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company