From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 29 4: 0:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from switchlab.net (ntmail13.lightrealm.com [216.122.135.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B5D37B718 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 04:00:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from seventhson@theseventhson.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from theseventhson.freeserve.co.uk ([212.113.15.130]) by switchlab.net (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA04706; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 04:03:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3AC3235A.2522147D@theseventhson.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:58:18 +0100 From: Benny Prijono X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arjan Knepper Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc 2.95.3 and STL References: <3AC1A050.62BE0194@pop3.NL.net> <20010328010123.A40915@dragon.nuxi.com> <3AC1B2C1.8BE22BD1@theseventhson.freeserve.co.uk> <20010328121539.A83100@dragon.nuxi.com> <3AC24E25.9207EDF6@ludd.luth.se> <3AC31B36.CE395CF1@jak.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Arjan Knepper wrote: > > Joachim Strömbergson wrote: > > > http://www.cuj.com/roundup/a.htm > > > > Fast-browsing it seems that conformance visavi STL is not the main focus > > of this article. It doeas talk about a STL roundup though. > > Exactly, > There isn't a list or table showing the particular issues with the various > STL (compiler and library) implementations. > mmm, no..no.. According to the magazine/printed version, there are two tests performed, i.e test to the compilers, and to the STL implementations. Each C++ compilers were tested with their default STL library, and tested against the scope of C++ standards, i.e. C++ language, C, and STL included. And then the second section deals specificly with STL conformance test. Each STL implementation (STL-Port included) was tested using the compiler the STL implementors are most confortable with. The tests were performed by three C++/STL conformance testers: Dinkumware, Perennial, and Plum Hall. Perennial and Plum Hall can test both C++ language and the STL, while Dinkumware can only test the STL conformance. > If someone knows a site where the various STL implementations are compared > with eachother please give a pointer. > The URL + magazine are exactly what you're looking for. As far as I notice (I only briefly browse the web version though), the difference between the printed and the online version is, the printed version has nice summary table of conformance level test results, of both compilers and STL implementations. The detail results should be available in the URL (I assume that this is what those zip files are there for). cheers, Bennylp To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message