Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 09:00:15 +0100 From: Sasa Stupar <sasa@stupar.homelinux.net> To: Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm@toybox.placo.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme Song) Message-ID: <FD6D79D49B90F67B47B4CDBA@[192.168.10.249]> In-Reply-To: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNOEBEFDAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> References: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNOEBEFDAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It doesn't work on winxp. I am going to build another machine with FreeBSD=20 5.4 and I'll try it then and let you know the results. Sasa --On 18. december 2005 14:02 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm@toybox.placo.com> = wrote: > > In looking at this again, I didn't realize you were pinging from > Win2K > > Win2K uses the -f option to set the Do Not Fragment bit, UNIX uses > the -f option to flood ping. Win2k ping does not have a flood ping > option. You can download a ping for Windows from Microsoft here: > > http://research.microsoft.com/barc/mbone/mping.aspx > > that does have an option for flooding traffic. ( set the milliseconds > between packets very low) but I have not tested it. Doubtless > others are available on the Internet. > > Ted > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Sasa Stupar >> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 6:07 AM >> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme >> Song) >> >> >> Nothing. From the GUI view it is at 0% of utilisation. >> >> Sasa >> >> --On 18. december 2005 3:51 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt >> <tedm@toybox.placo.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> what does the CPU of the router do when your doing that? >>> >>> Ted >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Sasa Stupar >>>> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 3:00 AM >>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme >>>> Song) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --On 18. december 2005 2:32 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt >>>> <tedm@toybox.placo.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>>>> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of >> Sasa Stupar >>>>>> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 2:21 AM >>>>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >>>>>> Theme Song) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --On 18. december 2005 1:33 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt >>>>>> <tedm@toybox.placo.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:sasa@stupar.homelinux.net] >>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 5:25 AM >>>>>>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; danial_thom@yahoo.com; Drew Tomlinson >>>>>>>> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >>>>>>>> Theme Song) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --On 16. december 2005 3:36 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt >>>>>>>> <tedm@toybox.placo.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>> From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:sasa@stupar.homelinux.net] >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:34 AM >>>>>>>>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; danial_thom@yahoo.com; Drew Tomlinson >>>>>>>>>> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >>>>>>>>>> Theme Song) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ted >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, here is test with iperf what I have done with and >>>>>>>> without polling: >>>>>>>>>> ************** >>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>> Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001 >>>>>>>>>> TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default) >>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>> [1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1088 connected with >>>>>>>>>> 192.168.1.200 port 5001 >>>>>>>>>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >>>>>>>>>> [1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 108 MBytes 90.1 Mbits/sec >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This is when I use Device polling option on m0n0. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If I disable this option then my transfer is worse: >>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>> Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001 >>>>>>>>>> TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default) >>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>> [1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1086 connected with >>>>>>>>>> 192.168.1.200 port 5001 >>>>>>>>>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >>>>>>>>>> [1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 69.7 MBytes 58.4 Mbits/sec >>>>>>>>>> *************** >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> BTW: my router is m0n0wall (FBSD 4.11). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> what are the cpu speeds and operating systems of all devices >>>>>>>>> in the packet path, what is the make and model of switchs in >>>>>>>>> use, provide dmesg output of the bsd box, a network diagram >>>>>>>>> of the setup, etc. etc. etc. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The above test results are not replicatable and thus, worthless. >>>>>>>>> Useful test results would allow a reader to build an exact >>>>>>>>> duplicate of your setup, config it identically, and get >> identical >>>>>>>>> results. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ted >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OK. The server (192.168.1.200) is FreeBSD 5.4 with Duron 900 >>>>>> and 3C905C >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The 3com 3c905 is not a very good card under FreeBSD the >> driver was >>>>>>> written >>>>>>> without support from 3com and is shakey on a lot of >>>> hardware. I would >>>>>>> say >>>>>>> there's a big question that your server is actually saturating the >>>>>>> ethernet. >>>>>>> Probably that is why your only getting 90Mbt. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> NIC; router is m0n0wall (FreeBSD 4.11) with three Intel >>>>>>>> Pro/100S Nics and >>>>>>>> Celeron 433; The user computer (192.168.10.249) is Celeron 2400 >>>>>>>> with winxp >>>>>>>> and integrated NIC Realtek 8139 series. Switch is CNET CNSH-1600. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Once again, the winxp+realtek 8139 is not a particularly >>>>>> steller combo, >>>>>>> I would question that this system could saturate the >>>> ethernet, either. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Diagram: <http://me.homelinux.net/network.pdf>; >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> dmesg from the router: >>>>>>>> ---------------- >>>>>>>> $ dmesg >>>>>>>> Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. >>>>>>>> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, >>>>>> 1992, 1993, 1994 >>>>>>>> The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. >>>>>>>> FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p11 #0: Wed Sep 7 13:49:09 CEST 2005 >>>>>>>> root@fb411.neon1.net:/usr/src/sys/compile/M0N0WALL_GENERIC >>>>>>>> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz >>>>>>>> CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (434.32-MHz >> 686-class CPU) >>>>>>>> Origin =3D "GenuineIntel" Id =3D 0x665 Stepping =3D 5 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Features=3D0x183f9ff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,P >>>>>>>> GE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR> >>>>>>>> real memory =3D 201326592 (196608K bytes) >>>>>>>> avail memory =3D 179142656 (174944K bytes) >>>>>>>> Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc1006000. >>>>>>>> Preloaded mfs_root "/mfsroot" at 0xc100609c. >>>>>>>> Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled >>>>>>>> md0: Preloaded image </mfsroot> 11534336 bytes at 0xc0504d9c >>>>>>>> md1: Malloc disk >>>>>>>> Using $PIR table, 8 entries at 0xc00fdef0 >>>>>>>> npx0: <math processor> on motherboard >>>>>>>> npx0: INT 16 interface >>>>>>>> pcib0: <Intel 82443BX (440 BX) host to PCI bridge> on motherboard >>>>>>>> pci0: <PCI bus> on pcib0 >>>>>>>> pcib1: <Intel 82443BX (440 BX) PCI-PCI (AGP) bridge> at device >>>>>>>> 1.0 on pci0 >>>>>>>> pci1: <PCI bus> on pcib1 >>>>>>>> isab0: <Intel 82371AB PCI to ISA bridge> at device 7.0 on pci0 >>>>>>>> isa0: <ISA bus> on isab0 >>>>>>>> atapci0: <Intel PIIX4 ATA33 controller> port 0xf000-0xf00f at >>>>>>>> device 7.1 on >>>>>>>> pci0 >>>>>>>> ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 >>>>>>>> ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 >>>>>>>> uhci0: <Intel 82371AB/EB (PIIX4) USB controller> port >>>>>>>> 0xd000-0xd01f irq 11 >>>>>>>> at device 7.2 on pci0 >>>>>>>> usb0: <Intel 82371AB/EB (PIIX4) USB controller> on uhci0 >>>>>>>> usb0: USB revision 1.0 >>>>>>>> uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 >>>>>>>> uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered >>>>>>>> chip1: <Intel 82371AB Power management controller> port >>>>>>>> 0x5000-0x500f at >>>>>>>> device 7.3 on pci0 >>>>>>>> pci0: <unknown card> (vendor=3D0x1274, dev=3D0x1371) at 8.0 irq 11 >>>>>>>> fxp0: <Intel 82550 Pro/100 Ethernet> port 0xd800-0xd83f mem >>>>>>>> 0xd0400000-0xd041ffff,0xd0460000-0xd0460fff irq 10 at device >>>>>>>> 15.0 on pci0 >>>>>>>> fxp0: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:62:f6:06 >>>>>>>> inphy0: <i82555 10/100 media interface> on miibus0 >>>>>>>> inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >>>>>>>> fxp1: <Intel 82550 Pro/100 Ethernet> port 0xdc00-0xdc3f mem >>>>>>>> 0xd0420000-0xd043ffff,0xd0462000-0xd0462fff irq 12 at device >>>>>>>> 16.0 on pci0 >>>>>>>> fxp1: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:9c:2a:16 >>>>>>>> inphy1: <i82555 10/100 media interface> on miibus1 >>>>>>>> inphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >>>>>>>> fxp2: <Intel 82550 Pro/100 Ethernet> port 0xe000-0xe03f mem >>>>>>>> 0xd0440000-0xd045ffff,0xd0461000-0xd0461fff irq 7 at device >>>>>> 19.0 on pci0 >>>>>>>> fxp2: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:8c:e4:f6 >>>>>>>> inphy2: <i82555 10/100 media interface> on miibus2 >>>>>>>> inphy2: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >>>>>>>> pmtimer0 on isa0 >>>>>>>> fdc0: <NEC 72065B or clone> at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq >>>>>>>> 2 on isa0 >>>>>>>> fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold >>>>>>>> fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 >>>>>>>> atkbdc0: <Keyboard controller (i8042)> at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 >>>>>>>> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 >>>>>>>> sio0: type 16550A, console >>>>>>>> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 >>>>>>>> BRIDGE 020214 loaded >>>>>>>> IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing. >>>>>>>> IP Filter: v3.4.35 initialized. Default =3D block all, >>>>>> Logging =3D enabled >>>>>>>> ad0: 3098MB <WDC AC33200L> [6296/16/63] at ata0-master PIO4 >>>>>>>> acd0: CDROM <LITE-ON CD-ROM LTN-527T> at ata1-master PIO4 >>>>>>>> Mounting root from ufs:/dev/md0c >>>>>>>> fxp1: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >>>>>>>> fxp0: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >>>>>>>> fxp2: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >>>>>>>> ata0: resetting devices .. done >>>>>>>> ------------- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you need more just ask for it. You don't need to be >>>> angry. Peace. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> OK, next question: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ftp transfer like this uses large packets, rerun the test >>>> with ping -f >>>>>>> with different ping packet sizes, post the results. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Remember, routers have to deal with many sized packets. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ted >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Interesting. I have tested like you've said and I could ping >>>>>> with packet >>>>>> size 1450 bytes. Everything bigger is telling that "packet must be >>>>>> fragmented but DF is set up". This is of course pinging >> from winxp to >>>>>> server. >>>>> >>>>> That is normal since under winxp ping sets the DF bit I believe. >>>>> >>>>> The larger packets are not what matters, the smaller >> packets are more >>>>> interesting. I find it hard to believe your getting the same >>>> throughput >>>>> with >>>>> flood pinging with 56 byte packets. >>>>> >>>>> Ted >>>>> >>>> >>>> Here is the output: >>>> ------------- >>>> C:\Documents and Settings\nathsasa>ping -t -f -l 56 mig29 >>>> >>>> Preverjanje dosegljivosti mig29.workgroup [192.168.1.200] z >> 56 B podatk >>>> >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >>>> >>>> Statistika preverjanja dosegljivosti za 192.168.1.200: >>>> Paketov: Poslanih =3D 46, Prejetih =3D 46, Izgubljenih =3D 0 >> (0% izguba), >>>> Povpre=E8ni =E8as v milisekundah: >>>> Minimum =3D 0ms, Maksimum =3D 0ms, Povpre=E8je =3D 0ms >>>> ----------- >>>> >>>> It's in my native language but the position is the same as >> in english. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sasa Stupar >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >>>> -- >>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>>> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/206 - Release Date: >>>> 12/16/2005 >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sasa Stupar >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/206 - Release Date: >> 12/16/2005 >> > --=20 Sasa Stupar
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FD6D79D49B90F67B47B4CDBA>