Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:52:01 +0200
From:      Aldis Berjoza <graudeejs@yandex.ru>
To:        Chuck Burns <break19@gmail.com>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Upgrading FreeBSD to use the NEW pf syntax. (Copied from freebsd-pf)
Message-ID:  <1023391353430321@web2h.yandex.ru>
In-Reply-To: <50ABB0C7.7070404@gmail.com>
References:  <op.wn1vxr1jjfousr@box.dlink.com> <CABzXLYPYtQanh5O6%2BTH0=e46P990iXcDoB0apY_BOtzmn9-S7Q@mail.gmail.com> <50ABAF8E.3020101@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <50ABB0C7.7070404@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


20.11.2012, 18:34, "Chuck Burns" <break19@gmail.com>:
> On 11/20/2012 10:27 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
>> šOn 11/20/12 11:43, Olivier Smedts wrote:
>>> š2012/11/20 Paul Webster <paul.g.webster@googlemail.com>:
>>>> šI am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF, I
>>>> šbelieve the final decision was that to many users are used to the old
>>>> šstyle pf and an upgrade to the new syntax would cause to much confusion.
>>> šBut a change like this is expected in a new major branch, ie.
>>> š10-CURRENT. Not so in -STABLE branches of course. I don't see the
>>> šproblem here.
>>>
>>> šCheers
>> šWhat would be the alternative? Being stuck with the old PF? šAs Olivier
>> šSmedts said, changes like that are expected in a complete new branch. If
>> špeople need to stay compatible, they are about to use 9.X as long as
>> šthey have migrated. The downside is more work. The bright side would be
>> šdevelopment/progression.
>>
>> šoh
>
> Why not release pf2 as a port? šThen those who want the new pf can use
> it, and those that want the old one can use it.
>
> Or, another option is a knob USE_NEWPF during buildworld will build the
> new pf, otherwise it'd build the old, default one.
>
> This way you can still introduce the change, but default to the old one
> for those of us who are too crusty to change. :)
>

FreeBSD already have 3x firewalls. Having 4th m I think, isn't desired.

-- 
Aldis Berjoza
FreeBSD addict



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1023391353430321>