From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Sep 15 19:49:36 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA15299 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 15 Sep 1997 19:49:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from w2xo.pgh.pa.us (w2xo.pgh.pa.us [206.210.70.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA15285 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 1997 19:49:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from w2xo.pgh.pa.us (w2xo.pgh.pa.us [206.210.70.5]) by w2xo.pgh.pa.us (8.8.5/8.8.4) with SMTP id WAA03341; Mon, 15 Sep 1997 22:49:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <341DF3AE.41C67EA6@w2xo.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 22:49:18 -0400 From: Jim Durham Organization: Dis- X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.0-970618-SNAP i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Lehey CC: The Hermit Hacker , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: StarOffice... References: <19970916102223.44582@lemis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Greg Lehey wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 15, 1997 at 09:38:04PM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > > > > Hi... > > > > I'm running a current 3.0 system, and am wondering if anyone is > > having problems running StarOffice? > > Well, yes. It doesn't seem to like the name server. > > > I've got linux_mod loaded, as shown by modstat. and try > > 'scalc3'...the process starts up, consumes a bunch of CPU and then > > slowly degenerates into an idle process... > > I haven't quite seen that. What I see is that it starts up, uses > about 4 seconds CPU time, then hangs for five minutes sending lookup > requests to the name server and ignoring the replies. Then it gives > up and carries on working normally. > > The other thing I see is that it continually uses CPU time, looping on > what looks like a sound card ioctl (I don't have a sound card in this > machine). I can't see anywhere to disable the sound card--does > anybody else have an idea? > > Greg Wow...I've asked about this a number of times and you're the first person who's said they have the problem. My wait is 2.5 to 3 minutes. Do you know what names for which it is requesting addresses from the name server? regards, -- Jim Durham