Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 11:53:00 +0200 From: Jonathan McKeown <jonathan+freebsd-hackers@hst.org.za> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BDB corrupt Message-ID: <200805121153.00809.jonathan%2Bfreebsd-hackers@hst.org.za> In-Reply-To: <15336578.20080512123806@mail.ru> References: <op.uavxx8ip2n4ijf@duckjen.nextgentel.no> <9FC19AC2-DAD8-418C-8B9C-F129DEC58CEF@gmail.com> <15336578.20080512123806@mail.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 12 May 2008 10:38, Anthony Pankov wrote: > Please, can anybody explain what is the problem with BDB (1.86). > > Is there known caveats of using BDB? Is there some rules which > guarantee from curruption or it is fully undesirable to use BDB under > high load? > > It is important for me because of using BDB in my project. Interesting. I would have thought that the two processes "find out advantages and problems of proposed solutions" and "choose a solution" had a natural ordering other than the one you seem to be using. Jonathan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200805121153.00809.jonathan%2Bfreebsd-hackers>