From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jan 19 01:12:33 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id BAA13785 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 01:12:33 -0800 Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA13778 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 01:12:22 -0800 Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.8/jtpda-5.0) with SMTP id KAA22531 ; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 10:13:12 +0100 Received: by blaise.ibp.fr (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA17551; Thu, 19 Jan 95 10:13:14 +0100 From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier ROBERT) Message-Id: <9501190913.AA17551@blaise.ibp.fr> Subject: Re: No lost+found? To: terry@uivlsi.csl.uiuc.edu (Terry Lee) Date: Thu, 19 Jan 1995 10:13:13 +0100 (MET) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199501182350.AA11404@uivlsi.csl.uiuc.edu> from "Terry Lee" at Jan 18, 95 05:50:44 pm X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.1.0-Development ctm#287 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23beta2] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 485 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > It seems that FreeBSD doesn't create the lost+found directory for > each UFS file system. Is this by design or an omission? It looks a little > odd since I'm so used to expecting it. But I don't mind as long as it is > harmless. When you'll have a crash, fsck will create the lost+found directory itself and expand it as necessary. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD keltia 2.1.0-Development #9: Tue Jan 17 21:12:14 MET 1995