Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 13:56:24 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com> Cc: FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG>, fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Anyone working on fsck? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0303171352260.70394-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <200303172126.QAA23205@thunderer.cnchost.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Bakul Shah wrote: > Anyway, support for all of these have to be done in the > filesystem first before fsck can benefit. yep > If instead you spend time "optimizing" just fsck, you will > likely make it far more complex (and potentially harder to > get right). You talk like I have a choice :-) I cannot change ufs/ffs and even if I could the clients wouldn't go for it. The problem space is Fsck of UFS/FFS partitions is too slow for 200GB+ filesystems. The solution space can not contain any answer that includes redefining UFS/FFS. Welcome to the real world. :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0303171352260.70394-100000>