From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 28 20:11:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 931C34F5; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 20:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E4E364D9A; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 20:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id ex7so20585550wid.0; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 12:11:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type; bh=G3VFIqj7hRQcVaSsyNUWcgYKaF0LvGDOGU/9zKCzoPY=; b=ox/MEesmYo+xNC3kw/dj6ClbVMNP6kywlUCXENYVSUJNaWMlDivPIPaKCONV9KIzOJ pGs1ZExReUcD+rsrlavpbzQXf4yCFxs9wK1SsCdauqHRwi3rJyUu9cgoBl33894NwCG/ sC3/GwRmPAB30vMIkkoIWs+GAx5czq4LDDfeOp6AXAkjvJ3M5VxRBoBSzmuLGV94D8rx JIVwsPrz+fqKcnZR1F0uB3zT20jdxz6DDvc6ToibvtO7opSWQPSIubdv37yth6VRYxLw +vPmtduZhA0ZSjt3rz1tB69sg8CCpsSfHFF1cG9skHu5y9ggWkVTZrjZ5pox37bN/67H W7eQ== X-Received: by 10.194.23.6 with SMTP id i6mr47198476wjf.26.1419797486483; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 12:11:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.dg ([197.86.132.10]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jp3sm36801434wid.9.2014.12.28.12.11.24 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 28 Dec 2014 12:11:25 -0800 (PST) From: David Naylor To: marino@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r370220 - in head/biology: . ncbi-blast Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 22:11:15 +0300 Message-ID: <1666307.NCDYOHOeBx@dragon.dg> User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (FreeBSD/9.3-STABLE; KDE/4.10.5; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <54A05E8E.20802@marino.st> References: <201410062016.s96KGZP8084850@svn.freebsd.org> <86sifzef1i.fsf@nine.des.no> <54A05E8E.20802@marino.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart31552887.ecOQt1le2B"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Dag-Erling =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= , svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, jwbacon@tds.net, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 20:11:28 -0000 --nextPart31552887.ecOQt1le2B Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Sunday, 28 December 2014 20:48:30 John Marino wrote: > On 12/28/2014 20:43, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: > > John Marino writes: > >> Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > >>> The original BLAST is at 2.2.26, while BLAST+ is at 2.2.30. > >>=20 > >> so what? a PORTEPOCH is matched to a specific package name. > >=20 > > Yes, and this name cannot be used for the original BLAST program wi= thout > > bumping PORTEPOCH. This port should have been named ncbi-blast-plu= s or > > something similar. >=20 > This is just an opinion. There is no technical basis for bumping > PORTEPOCH. To boil this down, you are saying the port has a misleadi= ng > name and should have been named something else by Jason who submitted= > the PR to add the port. If I may interject. It appears to me that the issue is a new port is u= sing=20 the name of an old port, thus packages of the old port may conflict wit= h the=20 new port. =20 However, in this case I do not believe it to be the case: - The old port (biology/blast [1]) has a PKGBASE of wu-plast - The new port (biology/ncbi-blast [2]) has a PKGBASE of ncbiblast Since pkg(8) uses the package name (defined in [3] as PKGBASE, which in= turn=20 is defined at [4] as ) in determining dependencies [5] and, as seen abo= ve,=20 these differ I think it is safe to assume that these are too completely= =20 different ports and will not get accidentally confused as the same port= by any=20 tool, thus PORTEPOCH does not need to be invoked. =20 Regards [1] See=20 http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/branches/2014Q3/biology/blast/Makefile?= revision=3D359976&view=3Dmarkup [2] See=20 http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/biology/ncbi-blast/Makefile?revisi= on=3D370220&view=3Dmarkup [3] See=20 http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/Mk/bsd.port.mk?revision=3D375740&v= iew=3Dmarkup#l4815 [4] See=20 http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/Mk/bsd.port.mk?revision=3D375740&v= iew=3Dmarkup#l2673 [5] See section "Manifest File Details", entry "name" from pkg-create(8= ) man=20 pages. --nextPart31552887.ecOQt1le2B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJUoGPmXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ5NDhFQzUxMUEyN0YwMzAyRTc5OUI1M0FB RDYzRkE4REQ2QjJEQTU1AAoJEK1j+o3WstpVHs0P/1t3pM6B8wGUUkpZ0XuZxQCd 8p9bgwn5326gTXwdWRaPzrSWPJZvFjcpFGxwMxFb2lzlEKS5KTAVV7PEWKj3x9E8 O7eUiX8tvCl+17RfZeCcvh2FuiW02ef+mM2v3lN8VFVQescQhJMTbSqNVB7VPQG4 fNxB55AXIWp0oqU7vDVo59fFwnJJyR2vOZ8qLgxDcOtWb2EhPA45QVyVOB3A76LJ ifzoac5LChwcMOghl/9BaSmAXTx0FSyHZtoBJirHSImfAm9Go4NUOc8FTkvntdDN J5iOJa4eCMLxQRmosTFSWAVu5lu42b9XDmYLu1EwdMtU1wewkvtlaWqb++pO3iOZ fa0snoXhF4dZ+aGEYMF5ykjLeffwP/bLO2hhmOEcSnU/1+/W9SCuDJXWmDvS3hS0 jB+odoLAqKUOodf0v9LEIJVE/J1Ux024qmzlbXwKmY6iEwHzh1+jQdDcy1KYSUZn YIlWib9P7sv/hN3ZNKxWwQMpzQSJRLHm49sUUcHSDxjDJAa+ZJe51y5V64JV5ehZ E+l1Pio61mWL6on7j/799XLvo92hofIx167GpeoHTrGfHh3Y2xl6oTJ3KQNA8N32 Ko5ZAVSFpqVv7jZVqifHdTxMHS4a/ocdanuML9I3nMgOIdQxrLvUEk+M8JBR8vM5 KsVBRlG4qSDdOO3dN7lG =seh5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart31552887.ecOQt1le2B--