From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Oct 23 17:10: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB5337B4CF for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 17:10:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id RAA50057; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 17:10:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 17:10:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010240010.RAA50057@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Andy Newman Subject: Re: kern/22103: 4.1-R with Adaptec and Vinum crashes on periodic daily Reply-To: Andy Newman Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/22103; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andy Newman To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, roman@xpert.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/22103: 4.1-R with Adaptec and Vinum crashes on periodic daily Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:07:34 +1100 When I had this problem and had a (very) brief debug session the panic was occurring on a dereference of the parent pointer in the buffer. Are there assumptions about completion ordering? (I didn't read the vinum code so excuse me if this is a stupid question). Or is it just an artifact odd SCSI interaction? -- Andy Newman, Principal Software Engineer, Silverbrook Research To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message