From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Mar 28 19:40:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from server2.highperformance.net (ip30.gte4.rb1.bel.nwlink.com [209.20.215.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24AC537B425 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 19:40:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (jcw@localhost) by server2.highperformance.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g2T3eAr08965 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 19:40:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcwells@highperformance.net) X-Authentication-Warning: server2.highperformance.net: jcw owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 19:40:10 -0800 (PST) From: "Jason C. Wells" X-Sender: jcw@server2.highperformance.net To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: The most sophisticated bikeshed Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org To whomever was working to bring in the new sendmail, thank you. To the others, your bikeshed will collapse due to all of the paint it must support. Sendmail has been around FreeBSD since the flood. Nearly every aspect of "bikeshed" and "how many hackers" has been part of this sendmail discussion. You hit on the idea that sendmail doesn't belong in the base system. Allow me to complete the thought. WHAT IS -CORE DOING ABOUT IT!? Bah! Sendmail is fine. Give it a rest. I read these two items in the FAQ just now. They are even funnier when given context. Sincerely, Jason C. Wells (saying DIE THREAD! DIE! in a few more words) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message