From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Jun 21 11:02:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA11338 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sun, 21 Jun 1998 11:02:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from greeves.mfn.org (greeves.mfn.org [204.238.179.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA11299 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 1998 11:02:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from measl@greeves.mfn.org) Received: (from measl@localhost) by greeves.mfn.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA01978; Sun, 21 Jun 1998 13:04:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from measl) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 1998 13:04:42 -0500 (CDT) From: User Measl Message-Id: <199806211804.NAA01978@greeves.mfn.org> To: measl@greeves.mfn.org, tomdean@ix.netcom.com Subject: Re: lpd/lpr problems Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I saw that little snippet in Lehey's book, and it didn't seem to make any difference whatsoever (either good or bad). I have given up for the time being, for lack of time to keep playing with this (we are in the middle of a rather large NT expulsion:), in the interim I wrote a down and dirty pseudo-spooler: it just reads from a pipe and writes directly to /dev/lpx. This woks great. Obviously, my problem is spooler-related. Thanks to all who tried to help on this. J.A. Terranson sysadmin@mfn.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message