Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 00:31:41 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Bernard Spil <brnrd@FreeBSD.org>, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>, FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: mariadb10* ports broken on 9.x since last commit Message-ID: <20160901213141.GQ83214@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <24C4A5AC-1EF1-49E0-A84A-86E630EE97D8@FreeBSD.org> References: <beff43a0d0b5c8808e5b5760051a1320@imap.brnrd.eu> <18b931f3-2b78-0fdf-c9ba-ba3c107a4f65@dougbarton.us> <02d2d44ad94044360e05d780ef3c1641@dougbarton.us> <E571F3E1-9929-435B-A53C-6BFFA82CF8B2@FreeBSD.org> <d27ef6c63ba791ae24f60997982f74e9@imap.brnrd.eu> <24C4A5AC-1EF1-49E0-A84A-86E630EE97D8@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:50:18PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > I don't know. I understood from Kostik that it would need r232832, but > apparently this breaks the ABI? Yes, kind of. I considered it not appropriate to change the interaction between csu and rtld for long-lived stable branch. Also, it might cause problems for other language translators which provide their own runtimes. That were the reasonings several years ago, when initializers were reworked, and definitely I do not want to disturb the branch near EOL. > > It is probably easier to work around this by configuring the binutils > port so it does not emit .init_array/.fini_array sections. It was already done in ports r421193. > > -Dimitry > > [1] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=232832 >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160901213141.GQ83214>