From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Aug 11 06:44:35 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1EBB1065673
	for <freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 06:44:35 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gonzo@hq.bluezbox.com)
Received: from hq.bluezbox.com (hq.bluezbox.com [70.38.37.145])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B398FC12
	for <freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 06:44:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [207.6.240.242] (helo=[192.168.1.64])
	by hq.bluezbox.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.73 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <gonzo@hq.bluezbox.com>)
	id 1T05Qg-0006E6-Rt
	for freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 23:44:12 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1463\))
From: Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@bluezbox.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD231BAC-93E9-4EA1-89C1-8D299CDA581A@bsdimp.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 23:44:14 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D36543E2-2AC1-495A-8514-73F43607F2C4@bluezbox.com>
References: <50256231.3030008@bluezbox.com>
	<CD231BAC-93E9-4EA1-89C1-8D299CDA581A@bsdimp.com>
To: "freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1463)
Sender: gonzo@hq.bluezbox.com
X-Spam-Level: ----
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "hq.bluezbox.com",
	has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	The administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On 2012-08-10, at 2:04 PM,
	Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
	> Please do. Ideally you'd post patches,
	but that's a big pita... > Total patch is huge,
	so although it's PITA indeed here is initial batch of patches.
	I split diff into several patches. Some of them have known problems but
	I guess it's enough to get ball rolling: [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-4.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	-1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
	-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
Cc: 
Subject: Re: projects/armv6 merge
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 06:44:35 -0000


On 2012-08-10, at 2:04 PM, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:

> Please do.  Ideally you'd post patches, but that's a big pita...
>=20

Total patch is huge, so although it's PITA indeed here is=20
initial batch of patches. I split diff into several patches.=20
Some of them have known problems but I guess it's enough to get
ball rolling:

http://people.freebsd.org/~gonzo/armv6/clocksource.diff
Do not check next scheduled event on APs until smp is started.

http://people.freebsd.org/~gonzo/armv6/fdt.diff
Bunch of FDT fixes

http://people.freebsd.org/~gonzo/armv6/lpc.diff
LPC32x0 support

http://people.freebsd.org/~gonzo/armv6/mge.diff
mge network interface fixes (Marvell-related)

http://people.freebsd.org/~gonzo/armv6/mv.diff
Marvel support and Armada XP kernel config

This one was messed up during the merge. HEAD version
and projects/armv6 version contains some conflicting definitions
in mvwin.h. I'd prefer if someone who's more comfortable
with this device family fixed it but if not - I'll
try to do it myself.

http://people.freebsd.org/~gonzo/armv6/smsc.diff

http://people.freebsd.org/~gonzo/armv6/sys-v6.diff
kernel part of ARMv6 port

http://people.freebsd.org/~gonzo/armv6/target.diff
Support for TARGET_ARCH=3Darmv6

http://people.freebsd.org/~gonzo/armv6/tegra.diff
Very early stage Nvidia Tegra2 support

http://people.freebsd.org/~gonzo/armv6/ti.diff
TI devices support: OMAP3, OMAP4, AM335X
Kernel configs for Pandaboard and Beaglebone

http://people.freebsd.org/~gonzo/armv6/userland-v6.diff
Userland part of projects/armv6=20


> On Aug 10, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote:
>=20
>> Any objections to merging projects/armv6 back to HEAD?
>>=20
>> There is one cache issue I'm aware of that still has to be fixed, but =
it doesn't affect arm architectures earlier than armv6. And we can work =
on it in trunk.
>>=20
>> If there are no objections - the plan is to split code drop into =
several patches and perform merge over weekend.
>>=20
>> --=20
>> gonzo
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to =
"freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>=20
>=20