From owner-freebsd-doc Wed Aug 8 11:30:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from bazooka.unixfreak.org (bazooka.unixfreak.org [63.198.170.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5104037B403 for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 11:30:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dima@unixfreak.org) Received: by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 192053E35; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 11:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bazooka.unixfreak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5D33C12D; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 11:30:32 -0700 (PDT) To: Chern Lee Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port tag In-Reply-To: ; from chern@meow.lab.nuxi.com on "Wed, 8 Aug 2001 11:19:04 -0700 (PDT)" Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 11:30:27 -0700 From: Dima Dorfman Message-Id: <20010808183032.192053E35@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Chern Lee writes: > Was there ever a conclusion reached on the discussion about the > tag? Not really. Some people wanted it integerated into , then we started talking about why we're extended DocBook at all, and I don't think anything ever came out of that. Assuming that a ports-specific tag or element is desired at all, I see no harm in committing this. It wouldn't be hard to write a regexp to change -> if the latter is desired. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message